Financial Guarantees, Sureties And Collateral

FUNDING BUTTON LINK

NEW BLOG POST HEADER

The Three Parties To A Surety Bond Arrangement - Douglas E. Castle

 

FINANCIAL GUARANTEES, SURETIES AND COLLATERAL By: Douglas E. Castle

Obligees in a business relationship (such as contractors, subcontractors and sometimes mere payers) are frequently called upon by obligors (the parties for whom they are rendering a service, even if that service is merely making payment) to enhance or further bolster the likelihood that they will perform by bringing in either a third-party guarantee or by assigning the rights to some supplemental collateral (assets which can be liquidated in the unfortunate event that the contractor, payer or other obligor is unable to either perform or pay in full on a timely basis.

In a difficult economy, small- to medium-sized businesses are being called upon to provide these assurances by those parties hiring them or financing them. The tools or arrangements that are utilized to fulfill that need for additional “comfort” are financial guarantees (issued by financially strong third parties), surety bonds and supplemental collateral, which latter may be in the form of a lien on real estate, a hypothecation of marketable securities or any other assets which are not related to or involved in the subject transaction. These are, candidly, easier to obtain for smaller transactions (and newer or smaller companies) than are surety bonds or financial guarantees.

A very select and limited group of companies provide any of these hedges against an obligor’s failure, but any one of these “enhancements” could be the difference between obtaining business or being left out.

Following is a brief treatise on financial guarantees and surety bonds:

Definition: A non-cancellable indemnity bond, backed by an insurance company, which guarantees that principal and interest will be paid in compliance with the underlying contractual agreement or promissory note. Financial guarantee bonds are used by debt issuers as a way of attracting investors. The guarantee provides said investors with an additional level of security that the investment will be repaid/obligation will be fulfilled in the event that the securities issuer is unable to do so. The bond may benefit the principal by enhancing the principal’s creditworthiness thereby lowering the cost of financing. The guarantee “wraps” the security/promissory note with the insurer’s indemnity. Because the bond represents an UNCONDITIONAL GUARANTEE of compliance/repayment, a preferred interest rate is often offered.

There are three types of ‘financial guarantee bonds’. The first category is small “finite” financial guarantee. These are essentially performance bonds with a payment guarantee

element. They may look like license/permit bonds on their face. The bonds often have a small penalty (denomination) and are underwritten like standard surety bonds, with extra emphasis on the principal’s (applicant’s) liquidity and the insurer’s ability to recover any loss paid. Examples are lease bonds and energy broker obligations. The second category is bonding of structured finance, and the third public finance.

Bond denominations within these latter two categories can be enormous. As a result of severe losses in the financial guarantee sphere New York State passed the ‘ Appleton Law’ and quickly other insurance regulators’ policies regarding financial guarantee followed suit with administrative regulations restricting financial guarantee to only MONOLINE insurers. In the U.S. market, there are very few participants. AMBAC, Assured Guarantee, CIFG, Financial Guarantee Insurance Company, Radian, RAM Reinsurance, and Syncora Guarantee carry the majority of this market. These companies specialize in the selection of financial guarantee risks and the ongoing surveillance of their principals.

With some exceptions, financial guarantee insurers DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN PRIVATE, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS. If you are engaging in a person-to- person or business-to-business contract and you seek to enhance your position with a financial guarantee, you WILL NOT OBTAIN A FINANCIAL GUARANTEE INSTRUMENT THROUGH STANDARD FINANCIAL GUARANTEE MARKETS.

Your only alternative is to approach a captive or specialty insurer based outside of the regulatory jurisdiction of the United States where carriers are not hampered by mono- line restrictions. Additionally, the few markets that will entertain private financial guarantee severely limit their exposure on each risk selected.

Financial guarantees for non-government issued securities, or asset-backed securities with very little worth DO NOT EXIST! If you are seeking a guarantee in the hundreds of millions of dollars, I recommend that you do not waste your time. You will not find one. Further, private financial guarantees are written with FULL COLLATERAL SECURITY. Financial guarantee insurers are not interested in promises of indemnity based on the speculation that your transaction, that your proposed project, will be successful, or on the ongoing profitability of your operation.

Financial guarantee bonds are considered to be a much higher risk than standard surety and fidelity products, therefore my due diligence must include a review of the proposed contract, the solvency and identity of the indemnitors, and the collateral that you wish to deposit to support the bond. Premiums are generally fifteen percent (15%) on face value per annum for those bonds up to one million, and ten percent (10%) on face value for those bonds in excess of one million dollars. Collateral security in the form of cash, letters of credit, or highly rated debt instruments (i.e., U.S. Treasury issues, notes, bills, warrants, and highly stable, publicly traded stock or bond issues) will be credited at one hundred percent (100%) of current market value. Unacceptable forms of collateral are REAL PROPERTY (although real estate might be considered by the obligee or lender to supplement or supplant a bond or other guaratnee in certain transactions) and ‘BLOCKED FUNDS LETTERS’.

And now a brief word about surety or financial guarantee bond “Ratings.”

When I receive requests for information about, or regarding the procurement of financial guarantee bonds, I am invariably asked about the carrier’s “rating.” To my knowledge, there are only three financial guarantee insurers with an A.M. Best rating which operate in the United States. Two of those entities are absolutely unwilling to write bonds for private contracts, one will consider them. The former two will only issue financial guarantee bonds to municipalities that collateralize the obligation with bonds or other instruments issued by that municipality, leaving only the third as a “rated” carrier from whom I receive authority.

Given the severe restrictions of financial guarantee to mono-line insurers, carriers that wish to engage in financial guarantee business in addition to other insurance lines are often forced to move to a domicile without those restrictions. Bermuda, Seychelles, the British Virgin Islands, and the Dominican Republic are currently the choice destinations for offshore captives.

There is no ‘automatic’ rating system for non-U.S. admitted carriers. In order to obtain an A.M. Best rating an insurer must ordinarily have certain ‘seasoning’ minimums during which time they are under market surveillance. The carrier’s financial statements and books must be open to the rating agency. These requirements cause problems for offshore captives.

First, by entry (admission) into the U.S. market, a carrier subjects itself to U.S. taxes, precisely one of the reasons for which insurers DO NOT enter. Second, not all insurers wish to share their financial statements with a market surveillance group. So, although I may be able to pair a principal with an A.M. Best rated carrier, you will have a great deal of difficulty identifying any other “rated” entity that will write these undertakings. Unrated carriers WILL provide audited financial statements demonstrating their solvency, and their current certificate(s) of authority.

I hope that my information is helpful in understanding this type of instrument. Please keep in mind that this market has few participants. They do not and will not deviate from the full collateral rule.

Call To Action: Understanding that neither I nor my management consulting companies provide or are licensed brokers for these types of guarantees or bonds (although we do frequently engage in arranging to provide for supplemental or substitute collateral [i.e., in the form of bank deposits, treasury securities, publicly-traded stock and real estate] with which to bring transactions into indirect or derivative compliance with the “full collateral” or “full coverage” rule, or to eliminate the need for surety or financial guarantee bonds entirely), please contact us at http://bit.ly/CASTLEDIRECT, and we’d be delighted to discuss your needs and your best choices for solutions. We pride ourselves on being creative – as we must when working hand-in-hand with small- to medium-sized client companies in this difficult economic climate.

Douglas E. Castle

NOTE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS ARTICLE SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED BY THE READER AS BEING LEGAL, FINANCIAL, TAX, ACCOUNTING, ECONOMIC OR INVESTMENT ADVICE. NO OFFERING OF SECURITIES OR OTHER INVESTMENT INTERESTS OF ANY TYPE IN ANY ENTITY IS MADE HEREBY, NOR IS A SOLICITATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF SECURITIES OR OTHER INVESTMENT INTERESTS OF ANY TYPE IN ANY ENTITY MADE HEREBY. THIS ARTICLE IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND REPRESENTS THE VIEW OF THE AUTHOR ONLY.

THIS ARTICLE IS COPYRIGHT 2014 BY DOUGLAS E. CASTLE, WITH ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY REPRODUCTION, TRANSMITTAL OR DISTRIBUTION OF THIS ARTICLE, EITHER IN WHOLE OR PART, IS UNAUTHORIZED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL, UNLESS FULL ATTRIBUTION IS GIVEN TO THE AUTHOR AND ALL IMAGES AND LINKS IN THE ARTICLE REMAIN INCLUDED AND “LIVE.”

http://www.LinkedIn.com/in/douglascastle

http://DouglasECastleBlog.com

http://DouglasECastleConsultancy.com

http://DouglasECastle.com


FUNDING BUTTON LINK


QUOTATIONS - Immortal Wisdom - WORDS - The Building Blocks Of Language - Linked Image - By Douglas E Castle














more Quotes

This Day in History


NOTICE









Messy Matrix (Eh, Neo?) Of Social Media Sharing Links
View DOUGLAS E. CASTLE's profile on LinkedIn
Share this page
RT Button
Contact Douglas E. Castle Follow Me on Pinterest
Follow Douglas E Castle on Quora


***************
This site is proudly affiliated with Global Edge International Consulting Associates, Inc. ["GEI”]
Free Subscription to The GEI Business Daily!
Sign Up For Our Free GEI Newsletter!
Receive Our Free GEI RSS Feed!

***Follow GEI's Company Page On LinkedIn!

Respond To Douglas E Castle
http://bit.ly/CASTLEDIRECT

Perspective Is Wisdom - Large
D.E.Castle's Daily Business Advisory Wrap-Up.
Skim It. But DON'T MISS It.
This site is the Management Consultants' and Chief Reconstruction Officers' best all-industry guide to analyzing, diagnosing, devising a strategy, creating either an Action Plan or an Emergence Plan and overseeing and monitoring the successful implementation of either in order to ensure the client organization's optimal, sustainable profitability. These plans are always made scalable to accommodate the size and needs of the client, whether it is fast-growing young company with an aggressive and ambitious agenda, or whether it is an older, larger, well-established business which is experiencing problems or which is at a crucial decision making point in its evolution as an entity, and which requires sound advice (and often implementation oversight and assertive "hands-on" assistance in the form of a powerful third-party representative agent or a an expert in the art of negotiation as its appointed "point person") regarding its next steps. In the alternative, Douglas E. Castle is expert at helping fast-track, rapidly emerging companies to growth through acquisitions, mergers, licensing, branding and both domestic and international strategic joint ventures to access better, more efficient supply chain sourcing and to open up wider global markets to dramatically increase the scope of possible new revenue opportunities.


Restructuring Debt In A Business Turnaround

FUNDING BUTTON LINK

NEW BLOG POST HEADER

Amortization Hourglass - Because Time Is Money - Turnarounds And Restructurings - DouglasECastleBlog.com -

 

As part of the Action Plan in any business turnaround, or in any plan of emergence from Chapter 13, reduction and restructuring of debt will play a key role, provided that the business involved in the emergence or “rescue” effort is inherently profitable by its nature  — in other words — has an otherwise viable business model which was just mishandled or mismanaged in its execution. If debt can be reduced or eliminated, that is optimal; however, the second alternative which is more palatable to most lenders involves debt restructuring.

You have two restructuring objectives in dealing with lenders or bondholders – one is to defer the payment of the principal (the “balloon”) of the debt and to try to pay it on an interest-only basis for a business recovery period; the other, which is far more popular and easier to negotiate is to restructure the debt amortization or payment schedule. This second alternative permits you, as the acting Chief Business Restructuring Officer, to offer your creditors an option where the debt can be paid in a self-liquidating schedule, but simply over a longer time. In fact, if the length of the loan payoff schedule is sufficiently lengthened, you may even offer the creditors a small sweetener, such as a slightly higher interest rate on the loan or bond principal amount as a risk premium for their patience. Even after doing this, your payments to retire the debt in full may still be substantially lower than they would have been at a shorter (i.e., more rapid) amortization schedule.

Let’s see how this rescheduling of amortization works, Mr. Turnaround Expert:

Firstly, we’ll assume that the remaining principal amount of debt on one of our client’s loans is $80,000,000, and that at present, the client is paying off the loan at an interest rate of 8% over a five-year amortization period, fully self-liquidating. This means that the client’s monthly debt service due on the loan is approximately $162,211.

Going further, let’s assume that the client’s Chief Restructuring/ Turnaround Officer has projected (conservatively) that the cash flow available to service the loan will be approximately $175,000. This gives us a narrow margin for error. If we calculate the debt service ratio [divide the available cash flow by the the monthly loan payment obligation], it comes out to be a very, very uncomfortable 1.07884. As a lender, I would much rather see a debt service ratio that approaches 1.50000… that would make me quite comfortable, assuming that the available cash flow projections are reasonable.

If our Chief  Restructuring/Turnaround Officer is a very good negotiator, and convinces the lender to reschedule the amortization of the remaining balance over a nine-year term, with a rate of 9% (our turnaround expert has given the lender an extra 1% as a risk premium for lengthening the amortization timeline), the monthly debt payments would now be $108,343.27 — we’ve cut $53,867.73 from our monthly fixed debt payment by doing this. Our new debt service ratio (assuming the $175,000 cash flow available to service the debt is the same, as it should be) will be 1.615236 instead of 1.07884. I now have a debt service ratio which exceeds the 1.50000 standard.

You can verify these numbers and experiment with other possibilities by clicking on The Loan Amortization Table.

Amortization gives you the opportunity to stay alive longer, but yet to generate sufficient cash flows to pay off this debt, simply by changing its associated amortization schedule. We have restructured the debt brilliantly, assuming no other changes in terms on the part of the creditor, and no additional concessions to the creditor (with the exception of the 1% risk premium) on the part of our turnaround advocate, The Chief Restructuring Officer. Note that he might have chosen to cal himself the Chief Turnaround Officer, but that is too obvious and is on the edge of being Politically Incorrect. “Restructuring” sounds more positive than “Turnaround,” which conjures up images of the grim reaper following the client company’s president around.

This has given us additional cash flow margin (for coverage of other expenses of more than $53,000 per month.

Why would the creditor (a bank, represented by the officer who approved the original loan and who is responsible for handling the relationship with the client) agree to this?

Our negotiator simply took the bank officer aside and apprised him of the following facts and conclusions, gently but firmly:

1. If the client company were to go out of business and liquidate (Chapter 7, perhaps), the proceeds left to pay the bank would be less than 50% of the remaining loan principal. That would mean a substantial loss to the bank attributable directly to the officer’s decision to extend credit;

2. The foregoing could be very injurious for the officer’s career objectives, or perhaps the ability to remain employed by the bank at all;

3. If the client company remained in business, there would be no write-down or loss relating to the loan (the principal would be paid in full), and the officer would have made a good financial and career decision. His decision to allow the rescheduling of the loan has made it possible for the client company to stay in business and pay off the loan in full. Plus, the officer can speak about how “good a deal maker he was” by adding a loan premium of  1%, increasing the bank’s yield on the loan;

4. The client company keeps its deposits, its payroll account, all of its 100 or so employees have consumer loan, credit card, car loan or lease, deposits, checking or other business with the bank, all of which will now will definitely stay intact due to the officer’s “goodwill gesture to keep the company in business and everyone employed”. Interestingly, the officer also gets a credit for funds supplied to the bank (i.e., deposits — especially to demand deposit accounts (i.e., business checking), and this client has kept an average total balance in the bank of close to $1.5 million, all of which the bank earns interest on (this is called in the banking trade “playing the float”) while the client, who receives no interest waits for funds to “clear” and the bank puts this money out on overnight interest-bearing transactions with its under-reserved or slightly illiquid brethren;

5. It becomes apparent that the Chief Restructuring Officer can make the bank officer (with his own stationery, business cards, lapel pin and pens) look like a clever, prudent potentially promotable businessperson in the eyes of the client and his superiors in the bank, whom the Chief Restructuring Officer has promised to speak with (in laudatory terms) in his behalf.

The theme is not only that amortization is like fiscal alchemy — it is also that if  a focal point of a turnaround Action Plan can be addressed with everyone emerging benefited (or at least not damaged as much), it can be negotiated.

Debt restructuring is a crucial part of most turnaround operations. Now you’ve gained a better insight.


FUNDING BUTTON LINK


QUOTATIONS - Immortal Wisdom - WORDS - The Building Blocks Of Language - Linked Image - By Douglas E Castle














more Quotes

This Day in History


NOTICE









Messy Matrix (Eh, Neo?) Of Social Media Sharing Links
View DOUGLAS E. CASTLE's profile on LinkedIn
Share this page
RT Button
Contact Douglas E. Castle Follow Me on Pinterest
Follow Douglas E Castle on Quora


***************
This site is proudly affiliated with Global Edge International Consulting Associates, Inc. ["GEI”]
Free Subscription to The GEI Business Daily!
Sign Up For Our Free GEI Newsletter!
Receive Our Free GEI RSS Feed!

***Follow GEI's Company Page On LinkedIn!

Respond To Douglas E Castle
http://bit.ly/CASTLEDIRECT

Perspective Is Wisdom - Large
D.E.Castle's Daily Business Advisory Wrap-Up.
Skim It. But DON'T MISS It.
This site is the Management Consultants' and Chief Reconstruction Officers' best all-industry guide to analyzing, diagnosing, devising a strategy, creating either an Action Plan or an Emergence Plan and overseeing and monitoring the successful implementation of either in order to ensure the client organization's optimal, sustainable profitability. These plans are always made scalable to accommodate the size and needs of the client, whether it is fast-growing young company with an aggressive and ambitious agenda, or whether it is an older, larger, well-established business which is experiencing problems or which is at a crucial decision making point in its evolution as an entity, and which requires sound advice (and often implementation oversight and assertive "hands-on" assistance in the form of a powerful third-party representative agent or a an expert in the art of negotiation as its appointed "point person") regarding its next steps. In the alternative, Douglas E. Castle is expert at helping fast-track, rapidly emerging companies to growth through acquisitions, mergers, licensing, branding and both domestic and international strategic joint ventures to access better, more efficient supply chain sourcing and to open up wider global markets to dramatically increase the scope of possible new revenue opportunities.