Restructuring Debt In A Business Turnaround



Amortization Hourglass - Because Time Is Money - Turnarounds And Restructurings - -


As part of the Action Plan in any business turnaround, or in any plan of emergence from Chapter 13, reduction and restructuring of debt will play a key role, provided that the business involved in the emergence or “rescue” effort is inherently profitable by its nature  — in other words — has an otherwise viable business model which was just mishandled or mismanaged in its execution. If debt can be reduced or eliminated, that is optimal; however, the second alternative which is more palatable to most lenders involves debt restructuring.

You have two restructuring objectives in dealing with lenders or bondholders – one is to defer the payment of the principal (the “balloon”) of the debt and to try to pay it on an interest-only basis for a business recovery period; the other, which is far more popular and easier to negotiate is to restructure the debt amortization or payment schedule. This second alternative permits you, as the acting Chief Business Restructuring Officer, to offer your creditors an option where the debt can be paid in a self-liquidating schedule, but simply over a longer time. In fact, if the length of the loan payoff schedule is sufficiently lengthened, you may even offer the creditors a small sweetener, such as a slightly higher interest rate on the loan or bond principal amount as a risk premium for their patience. Even after doing this, your payments to retire the debt in full may still be substantially lower than they would have been at a shorter (i.e., more rapid) amortization schedule.

Let’s see how this rescheduling of amortization works, Mr. Turnaround Expert:

Firstly, we’ll assume that the remaining principal amount of debt on one of our client’s loans is $80,000,000, and that at present, the client is paying off the loan at an interest rate of 8% over a five-year amortization period, fully self-liquidating. This means that the client’s monthly debt service due on the loan is approximately $162,211.

Going further, let’s assume that the client’s Chief Restructuring/ Turnaround Officer has projected (conservatively) that the cash flow available to service the loan will be approximately $175,000. This gives us a narrow margin for error. If we calculate the debt service ratio [divide the available cash flow by the the monthly loan payment obligation], it comes out to be a very, very uncomfortable 1.07884. As a lender, I would much rather see a debt service ratio that approaches 1.50000… that would make me quite comfortable, assuming that the available cash flow projections are reasonable.

If our Chief  Restructuring/Turnaround Officer is a very good negotiator, and convinces the lender to reschedule the amortization of the remaining balance over a nine-year term, with a rate of 9% (our turnaround expert has given the lender an extra 1% as a risk premium for lengthening the amortization timeline), the monthly debt payments would now be $108,343.27 — we’ve cut $53,867.73 from our monthly fixed debt payment by doing this. Our new debt service ratio (assuming the $175,000 cash flow available to service the debt is the same, as it should be) will be 1.615236 instead of 1.07884. I now have a debt service ratio which exceeds the 1.50000 standard.

You can verify these numbers and experiment with other possibilities by clicking on The Loan Amortization Table.

Amortization gives you the opportunity to stay alive longer, but yet to generate sufficient cash flows to pay off this debt, simply by changing its associated amortization schedule. We have restructured the debt brilliantly, assuming no other changes in terms on the part of the creditor, and no additional concessions to the creditor (with the exception of the 1% risk premium) on the part of our turnaround advocate, The Chief Restructuring Officer. Note that he might have chosen to cal himself the Chief Turnaround Officer, but that is too obvious and is on the edge of being Politically Incorrect. “Restructuring” sounds more positive than “Turnaround,” which conjures up images of the grim reaper following the client company’s president around.

This has given us additional cash flow margin (for coverage of other expenses of more than $53,000 per month.

Why would the creditor (a bank, represented by the officer who approved the original loan and who is responsible for handling the relationship with the client) agree to this?

Our negotiator simply took the bank officer aside and apprised him of the following facts and conclusions, gently but firmly:

1. If the client company were to go out of business and liquidate (Chapter 7, perhaps), the proceeds left to pay the bank would be less than 50% of the remaining loan principal. That would mean a substantial loss to the bank attributable directly to the officer’s decision to extend credit;

2. The foregoing could be very injurious for the officer’s career objectives, or perhaps the ability to remain employed by the bank at all;

3. If the client company remained in business, there would be no write-down or loss relating to the loan (the principal would be paid in full), and the officer would have made a good financial and career decision. His decision to allow the rescheduling of the loan has made it possible for the client company to stay in business and pay off the loan in full. Plus, the officer can speak about how “good a deal maker he was” by adding a loan premium of  1%, increasing the bank’s yield on the loan;

4. The client company keeps its deposits, its payroll account, all of its 100 or so employees have consumer loan, credit card, car loan or lease, deposits, checking or other business with the bank, all of which will now will definitely stay intact due to the officer’s “goodwill gesture to keep the company in business and everyone employed”. Interestingly, the officer also gets a credit for funds supplied to the bank (i.e., deposits — especially to demand deposit accounts (i.e., business checking), and this client has kept an average total balance in the bank of close to $1.5 million, all of which the bank earns interest on (this is called in the banking trade “playing the float”) while the client, who receives no interest waits for funds to “clear” and the bank puts this money out on overnight interest-bearing transactions with its under-reserved or slightly illiquid brethren;

5. It becomes apparent that the Chief Restructuring Officer can make the bank officer (with his own stationery, business cards, lapel pin and pens) look like a clever, prudent potentially promotable businessperson in the eyes of the client and his superiors in the bank, whom the Chief Restructuring Officer has promised to speak with (in laudatory terms) in his behalf.

The theme is not only that amortization is like fiscal alchemy — it is also that if  a focal point of a turnaround Action Plan can be addressed with everyone emerging benefited (or at least not damaged as much), it can be negotiated.

Debt restructuring is a crucial part of most turnaround operations. Now you’ve gained a better insight.


QUOTATIONS - Immortal Wisdom - WORDS - The Building Blocks Of Language - Linked Image - By Douglas E Castle

more Quotes

This Day in History


Messy Matrix (Eh, Neo?) Of Social Media Sharing Links
View DOUGLAS E. CASTLE's profile on LinkedIn
Share this page
RT Button
Contact Douglas E. Castle Follow Me on Pinterest
Follow Douglas E Castle on Quora

This site is proudly affiliated with Global Edge International Consulting Associates, Inc. ["GEI”]
Free Subscription to The GEI Business Daily!
Sign Up For Our Free GEI Newsletter!
Receive Our Free GEI RSS Feed!

***Follow GEI's Company Page On LinkedIn!

Restructuring Debt In A Business Turnaround by
Respond To Douglas E Castle

Perspective Is Wisdom - Large
D.E.Castle's Daily Business Advisory Wrap-Up.
Skim It. But DON'T MISS It.
This site is the Management Consultants' and Chief Reconstruction Officers' best all-industry guide to analyzing, diagnosing, devising a strategy, creating either an Action Plan or an Emergence Plan and overseeing and monitoring the successful implementation of either in order to ensure the client organization's optimal, sustainable profitability. These plans are always made scalable to accommodate the size and needs of the client, whether it is fast-growing young company with an aggressive and ambitious agenda, or whether it is an older, larger, well-established business which is experiencing problems or which is at a crucial decision making point in its evolution as an entity, and which requires sound advice (and often implementation oversight and assertive "hands-on" assistance in the form of a powerful third-party representative agent or a an expert in the art of negotiation as its appointed "point person") regarding its next steps. In the alternative, Douglas E. Castle is expert at helping fast-track, rapidly emerging companies to growth through acquisitions, mergers, licensing, branding and both domestic and international strategic joint ventures to access better, more efficient supply chain sourcing and to open up wider global markets to dramatically increase the scope of possible new revenue opportunities.

Leave a Reply